Some old images that I have taken in the past seem to relate to new work that I am creating now. They seem to have sighed a breath of life back into themselves. After taking a look at Eggleston's mammoth Whitney exhibition on Friday, I realized he would reuse old images- appropriating them in a slightly different manner with the next body of work. ie/ The Eggleston Guide somehow bleeds into Los Alamos. So can you tell the difference between the "classics" and the images that have never seen the light of day?
Comments